Skip to content
← All lenses✦ Core lens · Decision science

Bounded search

A way of reasoning built from the published work of Herbert Simon. It is a framework, not the person.

InstinctBounded rationality and satisficing

How does a person decide with limited time, attention and information?

Life
Milwaukee 1916 – Pittsburgh 2001
Horizon
1947–1980
In Feynman
/lens simon
✦ Their times

The times that shaped it.

Simon trained in political science at Chicago and studied how decisions were really made in city government. From 1949 he worked at the Carnegie Institute of Technology, where he helped found the study of organisational behaviour and, with Allen Newell, the field of artificial intelligence: their Logic Theorist proved theorems in 1956. He received the Turing Award with Newell in 1975 and the Nobel Prize in economics in 1978.

✦ The ideas

What it reasons with.

Each idea is tied to the work where it appears and the year that work was published.

  • 1947 · Administrative Behavior

    Decisions inside organisations

    Organisations shape decisions by setting their premises: the goals, information and routines that each member takes as given.

  • 1955 · A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice

    Bounded rationality

    Real decision makers have limited information and limited capacity to compute, so models of choice should start from those limits rather than from perfect optimisation.

  • 1956 · Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment

    Satisficing

    People search until they find an option that is good enough by their current aspiration, and the structure of the environment decides how well that simple rule works.

  • 1962 · The Architecture of Complexity

    Near-decomposability

    Complex systems that last tend to be built of nested parts that interact strongly inside and weakly between, so each part can be understood and repaired on its own.

  • 1971 · Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World

    Attention is the scarce resource

    The more information arrives, the more attention it consumes, so attention rather than information becomes scarce, and good design filters rather than adds.

✦ The questions

How it tests an idea.

Its characteristic question first, then the questions that follow from its ideas.

  1. How does a person decide with limited time, attention and information?
  2. With the time and information actually available, how would anyone have made this decision?
  3. Which parts of the problem can be solved separately, and which interactions cannot be ignored?
  4. Where is attention the bottleneck, and what is crowding it out?
The horizon

What it could know.

Born 1916Horizon 1947–1980Died 2001

Inside

It reasons only with ideas documented between 1947 and 1980. Herbert Simon lived until 2001, but every lens stops by 1980, before personal computers and the web.

Anything later reaches it only through the evidence a review retrieves, labelled as supplied.

Beyond

Prospect theory (1979) falls just inside the horizon. Later behavioural economics, later artificial intelligence and machine learning do not.

The cutoff is deliberate: a lens that can’t see today’s consensus can’t simply repeat it. This card hasn’t yet been reviewed by a scholar of Herbert Simon’s work.

✦ Blind spot

Where it fails.

A model of how people search for options can miss changing preferences, emotion and social context, and says little about where the sense of good enough comes from.

✦ Sources

Where it comes from.

Works by Herbert Simon, dated to first publication, and references about them.

Links checked 31 October 2026. The notes on this page paraphrase. Nothing here quotes Herbert Simon, and the lens never speaks as them.